______________________________________________________
250 Farb-Visitenkarten GRATIS*. In einem Wert von EUR 99,00!
Jetzt eigene Domains für 1,23 Euro/Monat
Ahoy,
since I got many eMails from users who wished to upgrade to kernel 2.4.18, asking me
whether I port newnat5 once more from 2.4.(13|16|17) to kernel 2.4.18, I decided to
make a huge, single patch out of my P-O-M'ed kernel which I upgraded to today, which
would again incorporate the "most necessary" (well, and some not so neccessary)
patches such as:
- REJECT don't defragment,
- config cleanup,
- conntrack+nat helper unregister,
- conntrack protocol destroy,
- conntrack protocol unregister,
- local NAT,
- macro trailing semicolon,
- netfilter arp,
- Newnat 13,
- h323,
- helper match,
- pptp,
- rpc,
- talk,
- tftp,
and which applies easily and cleanly on a vanilla kernel.
Please, don't take this as offense, but by the looks of my inbox many users aren't
comfortable with the P-O-M as it takes some time to understand and correctly apply
correlating patches from there. (And don't forget that some users are urging me to do
that - that's the disadvantage if you started porting something, afterwards the people
get known to the procedure and don't want to learn the P-O-M...)
Find it at http://www.roeder.goe.net/~koepi/ , following the link "4. Newnat...".
I really hope this doesn't get misinterpreted as disrespect. I just try to help, be
assured!
Best regards,
Koepi
P.S.: if you reply, could you please CC: me in the mail as I'm no longer subscribed?
Thanks :)
