On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 03:48:26PM +0200, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > > How I understood Harald is that he do not regard a userspace daemon > who dynamically changes the iptables ruleset as the correct approach, > but the correct approach rather a userspace daemon who directly > insert new connection tracking/NAT session entries as being the > correct approach.
Ahhh. OK then. > This may also be an possibility, but not as efficient or flexible, Right, which is why I was not in favour of that solution. > and I don't think this is how UPnP can be used. Also I don't think > this is anywhere close where Harald was aiming. Well, I was surprised to think that that may be where he was heading too. > From my understanding the two provide similar functionality yes, but > using different technology. [ details snipped ] Interesting. b. -- Brian J. Murrell
msg00586/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
