On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:29:07AM +0800, Fabrice MARIE wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Monday 15 April 2002 08:46, Brad Chapman wrote:
> > Mr. Harald,
> > > Thanks for the patch.  Unfortunately it's not that easy. Writing the
> > > 10-line patch is smallest part of the job.
> > > The interesting question is:  How to achieve backwards- and
> > > forwards-compatibility for
> > > - making old kernel work with new iptables (easy)
> > > - making new kernel work with old iptables (easy)
> > > - make new iptables compile with old kernel headers
> > > - make old iptables compile with new kernels (easy)
> >         Whoops - I completely forgot about that :(
> >         Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that, or I would have done
> > it. Is it just basically a bunch of #ifdefs, or is there additional magic
> > involved? I can remake the patch if required.....
> 
> Well the easy solution is to have a userspace patch (see the trivial

If I'm not mistaken, in case of REJECT it should be possible to do without
a userspace patch - which is really starting to make things weird.

There is no real change in the structure layout, it's just one additional
value that is becoming valid...

> Fabrice.

-- 
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ 
V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)

Reply via email to