On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:21:30PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:21:03PM +0200, Hervé Eychenne wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 09:09:11PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote:
> > > Well. As for the naming, I'd say: > > > - UNTRACKED for the state name (ESTABLISHED,RELATED,INVALID,UNTRACKED) > > > - notrack for the table name > > > - NOTRACK for the target name > > Why not simply PRETRACK, or PRECONNTRACK ? > > It would be coherent with the existing naming... > PRETRACK for which of the three? Oh, sorry... I was thinking about the chain name. I guess we need one, right ? PRECONNTRACK(ING) is analoguous to PREROUTING, for example. RV -- _ (°= Hervé Eychenne //) v_/_ WallFire project: http://www.wallfire.org/
