* Thomas Heinz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Netfilter supports arbitrary netmasks for IP addresses which is more > powerful than just those IP/x (0 <= x <= 32) expressions. > For example one could use IP/255.0.255.255 (IP/23.13.42.0 would also work > ;-). > > Are masks that cannot be expressed in the IP/x schmeme (at least not in one > rule) used in practise? Are they used at all in firewall rulesets?
I'm pretty confident they're not valid and don't make sense.
Stephen
msg01078/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
