On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 14:07, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Wednesday 12 June 2002 21:02, Martin Josefsson wrote: > > > It adds a new parameter to ip_ct_refresh called force, if set to > > non-zero a timer update will be forced. > > Hmm.. this may be a little hard to enforce at all times.. > > Why don't you make the filter simply filter out any timer updates that > would increase the timer by less than HZ? > > change = new_interval - current_remaining_time > > if (change < 0 || change >= HZ) > update the timer > > Feels both cleaner and safer to me..
This sounds like a very good idea, it's a good thing I have you guys to straighten me out :) Will send new patch later this evening. And I'll even test it before sending :) -- /Martin Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
