On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:56:24AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 07:15:26PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > > Please try to send patches as mime attachment to ensure no corruption > > occurs. > > Okay this is confusing. Your scoreboard guidelines > (http://www.netfilter.org/scoreboard/) say that you should include > patches "straight in the body of the message, not MIME'd." Honestly > I've always found this policy bizzare.
This is because Rusty wrote it, and he wants to have it this way [like many other kernel hackers incl. David Miller] because emacs doesn't handle mime mail. > Either way we should pick a standard and follow it. Frankly MIME is a > common standard and attaching patch is intuitive. So I think we should > go that route. yes. The core team agreed on that long time ago, since I'm handling most patches these days I am the one to set the rules ;) I'm updating the scoreboard/index.html now. > Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Live long and prosper - Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M+ V-- PS++ PE-- Y++ PGP++ t+ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ !DI !D G+ e* h--- r++ y+(*)
msg01361/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
