On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 10:21:36PM +0200, Marcus Sundberg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> The multiport match checks for the IPT_INV_PROTO flag in the 'flags'
> member of struct ipt_ip instead of in the 'invflags' member.

thanks for this fix.
> 
> diff -ur linux.current/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_multiport.c 
>linux-mine/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_multiport.c
> --- linux-2.4.19-rc1/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_multiport.c       Tue Jun 20 23:32:27 
>2000
> +++ linux/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_multiport.c  Tue Jul  9 10:43:23 2002
> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
>  
>       /* Must specify proto == TCP/UDP, no unknown flags or bad count */
>       return (ip->proto == IPPROTO_TCP || ip->proto == IPPROTO_UDP)
> -             && !(ip->flags & IPT_INV_PROTO)
> +             && !(ip->invflags & IPT_INV_PROTO)
>               && matchsize == IPT_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ipt_multiport))
>               && (multiinfo->flags == IPT_MULTIPORT_SOURCE
>                   || multiinfo->flags == IPT_MULTIPORT_DESTINATION
> 
> (Where should I send this btw? The kernel part of iptables doesn't
> seem to be in the netfilter CVS. Was I supposed to create a p-o-m
> patch? Or send it directly to Marcelo?)

send it to the netfilter development list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]). The netfilter developers will then 
check/test and submit to DaveM for kernel inclusion.

> //Marcus

-- 
Live long and prosper
- Harald Welte / [EMAIL PROTECTED]               http://www.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
GCS/E/IT d- s-: a-- C+++ UL++++$ P+++ L++++$ E--- W- N++ o? K- w--- O- M- 
V-- PS+ PE-- Y+ PGP++ t++ 5-- !X !R tv-- b+++ DI? !D G+ e* h+ r% y+(*)

Reply via email to