This is not itself a conflict, move this check out of this function.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <[email protected]>
---
src/evaluate.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index a294070..5ef035b 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -395,11 +395,6 @@ static int resolve_protocol_conflict(struct eval_ctx *ctx,
struct stmt *nstmt = NULL;
int link, err;
- if (desc == payload->payload.desc) {
- payload->payload.offset += ctx->pctx.protocol[base].offset;
- return 0;
- }
-
err = supersede_dep(ctx, desc, payload);
if (err <= 0)
return err;
@@ -448,6 +443,14 @@ static int __expr_evaluate_payload(struct eval_ctx *ctx,
struct expr *expr)
return -1;
list_add_tail(&nstmt->list, &ctx->stmt->list);
} else {
+ /* No conflict: Same payload protocol as context, adjust offset
+ * if needed.
+ */
+ if (desc == payload->payload.desc) {
+ payload->payload.offset +=
+ ctx->pctx.protocol[base].offset;
+ return 0;
+ }
/* If we already have context and this payload is on the same
* base, try to resolve the protocol conflict.
*/
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
