On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 01:56:32PM +0200, Carlos Falgueras García wrote:
> On 08/10/2016 01:41 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> >>@@ -1025,10 +1033,16 @@ int nftnl_expr_foreach(struct nftnl_rule *r,
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_ALIAS(nftnl_expr_foreach, nft_rule_expr_foreach);
> >>
> >>-struct nftnl_expr_iter {
> >>-   const struct nftnl_rule *r;
> >>-   struct nftnl_expr       *cur;
> >>-};
> >
> >I have kept this structure definition here, we don't have to scroll up
> >and down to get the context when looking at the iterators code.
> >
> >After my change, the patch looks even smaller.
> 
> But we will need it at the next patch, so I will include these changes in
> the patch : 2/4 - "Implement rule comparison". It is ok?

You can place nftnl_rule_cmp() after the iterators, so you don't need
this forward declaration.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to