Hi Pablo,

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Feng Gao <gfree.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:06:51PM +0800, Feng Gao wrote:
>> > How about this patch ?
>>
>> Is this a theoretical problem? I would really prefer if you do your
>> work to collect traces that show that the actual sequence adjustment
>> is not correct.
>>
>> > I think it should be one bug of seqadjust.
>>
>> "I think this is a bug" is not sufficient, I expect you prove this is
>> not correct.
>
>
> Yes. Now I only analyze it by codes, and it should check ack flag in theory.
> Because TCP REST could not contain ack.
>
> But I will set up one environment and generate the packet trace.
>
> Regards
> Feng
>

I have gotten the packet trace which shows seqadj adjusts the 0 ack
value, and sent the v3 patch which contains the reproduce steps,
packet trace, and logs.

Best Regards
Feng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to