Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org> writes:

> Make sure we skip the current hook from where the packet was enqueued,
> otherwise the packets gets enqueued over and over again.
>
> Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pa...@netfilter.org>
> ---
> v2: Make sure next hook is non-null, otherwise we are at the end of the
>     hook list and we can skip nf_iterate().
>
>  net/netfilter/nf_queue.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> index 96964a0070e1..691e713d70f5 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> @@ -185,8 +185,9 @@ void nf_reinject(struct nf_queue_entry *entry, unsigned 
> int verdict)
>       }
>  
>       entry->state.thresh = INT_MIN;
> +     hook_entry = rcu_dereference(hook_entry->next);
>  
> -     if (verdict == NF_ACCEPT) {
> +     if (hook_entry && verdict == NF_ACCEPT) {
>       next_hook:
>               verdict = nf_iterate(skb, &entry->state, &hook_entry);
>       }

ACK.  I thought switch case below could have a problem, but re-checked
the first nf_queue leg, and it seems okay.

-Aaron
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to