Hi Liping, On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Liping Zhang <zlpnob...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-01-20 15:42 GMT+08:00 Feng Gao <gfree.w...@gmail.com>: > [...] >> In v2 patch, I copied your recommend codes "if (cnt && --cnt == 0)". >> Today I think it is not right to use "--cnt", it should use "cnt--". >> Because when the cnt is 1, the "--cnt" would break directly. >> So I send the v3 patch. > > But this "if (cnt && cnt-- == 0) break;" check condition seems still > incorrect, > when the cnt is 1, next round cnt will become 0, so we will fail to break the > loop ...
Thanks your catch. So we should keep the "(cnt && --cnt == 0)", with _nf_tables_table_disable(net, afi, table, i+1) in the error handler of nf_tables_table_enable. Do you think if "i+1" is a little werid? Regards Feng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
