On Sun, 2017-04-02 at 13:45 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > -   for (i = sizeof(struct tcphdr); i <= tcp_hdrlen - TCPOLEN_MSS; i += 
> > optlen(opt, i)) {
> > +   for (i = sizeof(struct tcphdr); i < tcp_hdrlen - TCPOLEN_MSS; i += 
> > optlen(opt, i)) {
> >             if (opt[i] == TCPOPT_MSS && opt[i+1] == TCPOLEN_MSS) {
> >                     u_int16_t oldmss;
> 
> maybe I am low on caffeeine but this looks fine, for tcp header with
> only tcpmss this boils down to "20 <= 24 - 4" so we acccess offsets 20-23 
> which seems ok.

I am definitely low on caffeine ;)

An issue in this function is that we might add the missing MSS option,
without checking that TCP options are already full.

But this should not cause a KASAN splat, only some malformed TCP packet

(tcph->doff would wrap)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to