On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 11:23:40PM +0200, Eric Leblond wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, 2017-09-04 at 22:53 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 10:43:48PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 09:55:58AM +0200, Eric Leblond wrote:
> > > > This patch introduces the nft_print function that has to be used
> > > > instead of printf to output information that were previously send
> > > > to stdout. This function accumulate the output in a buffer that
> > > > can
> > > > be fetched by the user with the nft_ctx_get_output() function.
> > > > 
> > > > This modification will allow the libnftables library to provide
> > > > an
> > > > easy way to the users to get the output data and display them
> > > > like
> > > > they want.
> > > 
> > > tests/shell/./run-tests
> > > 
> > > is reporting problems with this :-(
> > 
> > Eric, I can also see there are missing printf() to nft_print()
> > conversion on the monitor side.
> > 
> > I would expect the simple API works like this: if you pass the
> > "monitor" command, it justs prints events to whatever destination you
> > have specified.
> > 
> > This is the most simple integration that makes sense to me.
> > 
> > Therefore, I think it would be good to convert those too to use
> > nft_print().
> 
> Yes indeed, that make sense. For each message, the user get the human
> formatted version of the event.

Yes. Once we have json support for this - in the high level
representation - we could add a function to specify the print mode.
But that is something we can of course later on, just thinking aloud.

> Do you want me to cook that based on the previously attached patch ?

Please do. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to