Eric Dumazet <> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 12:13 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > syzbot reported a division by 0 bug in the netfilter nat code:
> > Adding the relevant check at parse time could break existing
> > setup, moreover we would need to read/write such values atomically
> > to avoid possible transient negative ranges at update time.
> I do not quite follow why it is so hard to add a check at parse time.
> Breaking buggy setups would not be a concern I think.

It would be possible for xtables but afaics in nft_nat.c case
(nft_nat_eval) range.{min,max}_proto.all values are loaded from nft
registers at runtime.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Reply via email to