From: Gao Feng <gfree.w...@vip.163.com>

The __IPS_MAX_BIT is used in __ctnetlink_change_status as the max bit
value. When add new bit IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT whose value is 14, we should
increase the __IPS_MAX_BIT too, from 14 to 15.

There is no any bug in current codes, although it lost one loop in
__ctnetlink_change_status. Because the new bit IPS_OFFLOAD_BIT belongs
the IPS_UNCHANGEABLE_MASK.

Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <gfree.w...@vip.163.com>
---
 include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h 
b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
index c712eb6..336014b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ enum ip_conntrack_status {
                                 IPS_EXPECTED | IPS_CONFIRMED | IPS_DYING |
                                 IPS_SEQ_ADJUST | IPS_TEMPLATE | IPS_OFFLOAD),
 
-       __IPS_MAX_BIT = 14,
+       __IPS_MAX_BIT = 15,
 };
 
 /* Connection tracking event types */
-- 
1.9.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to