2018-07-02 20:45 GMT+09:00 Florian Westphal <f...@strlen.de>: > Taehee Yoo <ap420...@gmail.com> wrote: >> In order to destroy elements of set, a rhashtable_free_and_destroy() >> is used. the rhashtable_free_and_destroy() cancels a re-hash deferred work >> then walks and destroys elements. at this moment, some elements are >> still in a future_tbl. that elements are not destroyed. > > Wait. Isn't that a bug in rhashtable_free_and_destroy()? > > I'd rather see rhashtable_free_and_destroy() do it correctly if > possible rather than asking users of rhashtable_free_and_destroy() > to not use that function... >
Thank you for reviewing! I didn't doubt that rhashtable_free_and_destroy has bug. But on second thought, you're right. it seems that it's a bug in rhashtable_free_and_destroy() > Or did i misunderstand and its a nft specific problem? You understood it correctly and In my opinion, it's an ordinary case. Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
