On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 04:20:52PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 11:42:05AM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote: > > The first test in there shows how the current cache update strategy > > causes trouble. The second test shows that proposed "locking" of cache > > when local entries are added is flawed, too. > > Applied, thanks. > > BTW, is your recent patch to lock the cache solving all caching issues?
Nope, part two of the testcase I submitted here exposes why it's flawed, too. :(
