Hi Pablo, On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:25:45PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 08:06:10PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > [...] > > diff --git a/iptables/xtables.c b/iptables/xtables.c > > index 24a6e234bcf4b..da11e8cc159a0 100644 > > --- a/iptables/xtables.c > > +++ b/iptables/xtables.c > > @@ -1064,10 +1064,6 @@ void do_parse(struct nft_handle *h, int argc, char > > *argv[], > > p->chain); > > } > > > > - if (!p->xlate && !nft_chain_exists(h, p->table, p->chain)) > > - xtables_error(OTHER_PROBLEM, > > - "Chain '%s' does not exist", p->chain); > > After this chunk is applied I get this error: > > # iptables-nft -I test > iptables: Index of insertion too big. > > We can probably get this aligned with legacy, ie. > > iptables: No chain/target/match by that name.
I have a patch series dealing with any error message misalignment between legacy and nft variants waiting to be submitted upstream. I just didn't want to send too many series depending upon each other at once. So you may consider this virtually fixed already. :) Cheers, Phil
