Phil Sutter <[email protected]> wrote: > Aligning arptables-nft output with legacy one is rather important IMO > since there is no way to check existence of a rule (like with 'iptables > -C'), so one should expect existence of scripts parsing list/save > output. Therefore I think it is acceptable to carry quite a bit of extra > code in MARK and CLASSIFY targets.
Sucks but I agree. I will review (and likely apply) this series later today.
