Phil Sutter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 03:24:24PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote: > > Phil Sutter <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This will be used later to identify ebtables user-defined chain policy > > > rules. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > iptables/nft.c | 3 +++ > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/iptables/nft.c b/iptables/nft.c > > > index 8d0d10177f5ed..4010ccd51d5aa 100644 > > > --- a/iptables/nft.c > > > +++ b/iptables/nft.c > > > @@ -1115,6 +1115,7 @@ int add_counters(struct nftnl_rule *r, uint64_t > > > packets, uint64_t bytes) > > > > > > enum udata_type { > > > UDATA_TYPE_COMMENT, > > > + UDATA_TYPE_EBTABLES_POLICY, > > > > Pablo, do you see any problems with this? > > I'm a bit concerned native nft could clash with this. > > Short-term best would be to extend enum udata_type in nftables' > include/rule.h by this type to avoid accidental reuse. Mid-term we > should move all the udata_type definitions into libnftnl along with > getters/setters to centralize management.
I'm fine with that; Pablo, just let me know and I will push Phils patches.
