On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:51:34PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > According to RFC4291, IPv6 prefixes are represented in CIDR notation. > While the use of a "netmask" notation is not explicitly denied, its > existence merely stems from applying IPv4 standards to IPv6. This is not > necessarily correct. > > Therefore change printing of IPv6 prefixes to use CIDR notation as long > as the address mask's bits are left contiguous.
Applied, thanks. Only affects -L listing, right? I think people should not be scraping that output.
