On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 06:49:41PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Phil Sutter <p...@nwl.cc> wrote: > > > Right. Do you think we should also add in inet-nat.nft example, > > > or even replace the ipvX- ones? > > > > Having an inet family nat example would be wonderful! Can inet NAT > > replace IPvX-ones completely or are there any limitations as to what is > > possible in rules? > > I'm not aware of any limitations.
Only limitation is that older kernels do not support NAT for the inet family.
