Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmanc...@riseup.net> wrote:
> I have been thinking of a way to update a quota object. i.e raise or lower the
> quota limit of an existing object. I think it would be ideal to implement the
> operations of updating objects in the API in a generic way.
> 
> Therefore, we could easily give update support to each object type by adding 
> an
> update operation in the "nft_object_ops" struct. This is a conceptual patch so
> it does not work.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmanc...@riseup.net>
> ---
>  include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h        |  4 ++++
>  include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h |  2 ++
>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c            | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h 
> b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> index 9b624566b82d..bd1e6c19d23f 100644
> --- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> +++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> @@ -1101,6 +1101,7 @@ struct nft_object_type {
>   *   @eval: stateful object evaluation function
>   *   @size: stateful object size
>   *   @init: initialize object from netlink attributes
> + *   @update: update object from netlink attributes
>   *   @destroy: release existing stateful object
>   *   @dump: netlink dump stateful object
>   */
> @@ -1112,6 +1113,9 @@ struct nft_object_ops {
>       int                             (*init)(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>                                               const struct nlattr *const tb[],
>                                               struct nft_object *obj);
> +     int                             (*update)(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> +                                               const struct nlattr *const 
> tb[],
> +                                               struct nft_object *obj);
>       void                            (*destroy)(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>                                                  struct nft_object *obj);
>       int                             (*dump)(struct sk_buff *skb,
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h 
> b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> index 82abaa183fc3..8b0a012e9177 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_tables.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ enum nft_verdicts {
>   * @NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ: create a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
>   * @NFT_MSG_GETOBJ: get a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
>   * @NFT_MSG_DELOBJ: delete a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
> + * @NFT_MSG_UPDOBJ: update a stateful object (enum nft_obj_attributes)
>   * @NFT_MSG_GETOBJ_RESET: get and reset a stateful object (enum 
> nft_obj_attributes)
>   * @NFT_MSG_NEWFLOWTABLE: add new flow table (enum nft_flowtable_attributes)
>   * @NFT_MSG_GETFLOWTABLE: get flow table (enum nft_flowtable_attributes)
> @@ -119,6 +120,7 @@ enum nf_tables_msg_types {
>       NFT_MSG_NEWOBJ,
>       NFT_MSG_GETOBJ,
>       NFT_MSG_DELOBJ,
> +     NFT_MSG_UPDOBJ,

This breaks ABI, new enums need to be added at the end.

But I wonder if we can't just re-use NEWOBJ and teach it to update
the object if it exists already.

Userspace can already pass EXCL flag to bail out for the 'exists' case.

I agree that such feature (object update) is a good idea.

Reply via email to