On 04/17/2019 02:18 AM, linmiaohe wrote:
> From: Jie Liu <liujie...@huawei.com>
> 
> If we set sysctl_wmem_max or sysctl_rmem_max larger than INT_MAX,
> the send/receive buffer of sock will be an negative value. Same as
> when the val is larger than INT_MAX/2.
> 
> Fixes: 1c003b1580e2 ("ipvs: wakeup master thread")
> Reported-by: Qiang Ning <ningqia...@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmia...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jie Liu <liujie...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> index 2526be6b3d90..c0e4cbed6e74 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c
> @@ -1278,14 +1278,12 @@ static void set_sock_size(struct sock *sk, int mode, 
> int val)
>       /* setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RCVBUF, &val, sizeof(val)); */
>       lock_sock(sk);
>       if (mode) {
> -             val = clamp_t(int, val, (SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF + 1) / 2,
> -                           sysctl_wmem_max);
> -             sk->sk_sndbuf = val * 2;
> +             val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_wmem_max);
> +             sk->sk_sndbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF);

What prevents val * 2 to overflow ? 

Code in sock_setsockopt() looks quite different.

>               sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_SNDBUF_LOCK;
>       } else {
> -             val = clamp_t(int, val, (SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF + 1) / 2,
> -                           sysctl_rmem_max);
> -             sk->sk_rcvbuf = val * 2;
> +             val = min_t(u32, val, sysctl_rmem_max);
> +             sk->sk_rcvbuf = max_t(int, val * 2, SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF);
>               sk->sk_userlocks |= SOCK_RCVBUF_LOCK;
>       }
>       release_sock(sk);
> 

Reply via email to