Okay ..
         
        I am currently quite content with iptables as it stands on my 
system..
        kernel 2.4.13, and iptables 1.2.4 meets our needs quite 
happily..

        However, I've recently moved to an Athlon on the (questionable) 
Via
        chipset, and I've been given to understand that there is a fix 
in 2.4.17
        kernel for this....

        Me being slightly mad and not having to worry too much about 
production
        quality (my desktop PC, and our firewall/gateway for a 5 pc 
home network)
        I've decided to see just what all I can get into the system, 
thus for some
        insane reason I am trying to put CVS iptables in ...

        Here be my situation... per Harald's (offlist) suggestion I'm 
now working
        at getting iptables CVS onto 2.4.18rc2 (actually Harald 
suggested rc1 --
        but the few diffs are likely worth it considering my original 
point..the
        Athlon/Via situation)

        If I put in the rc2 patch, I cannot apply newnat7 from patch o 
matic
        if I put in newnat7 on 2.4.17, part of the patch for
        /net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_irc.c out of the 2.4.18rc2 
patch
        will not apply. (see attatched .rej file) -- I cannot see where 
this might
        be in that target, and am not sure if this causes a disastrous 
break.           
        Should I even be trying this? -- or do I just need another cup 
of coffee and a
        few valium....

        *grin*

        Alistair Tonner
         

Attachment: ip_conntrack_irc.c.rej
Description: application/reject

Reply via email to