have the same troubles

  
  _____  

Clemenca´s Place 
  
Clemens Fida 
Kirchenplatz 5, 2301 Grossenzersdorf,  Austria 
Phone: 0664-543-53-64 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Visit http://www.clemenca.at/ 
  


Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with 
experience.

 

 

 



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Micke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Gesendet: Freitag, 15. März 2002 16:20
An: Frank Fiene; Netfilter
Betreff: Re: Kernel compile error after applying pending patches



----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Fiene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Netfilter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:28 PM
Subject: Kernel compile error after applying pending patches


> Hi,
>
> i have problems to compile a virgin 2.4.18 kernel after applying the 
> pending patches from cvs. make modules ays:
>
> ip_conntrack_standalone.c: In function `kill_proto':
> ip_conntrack_standalone.c:41: structure has no member named `dst'
> ip_conntrack_standalone.c:43: warning: control reaches end of non-void 
> function
> make[2]: *** [ip_conntrack_standalone.o] Error 1
> make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/netfilter'
> make[1]: *** [_modsubdir_ipv4/netfilter] Error 2
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux/net'
> make: *** [_mod_net] Error 2
>
> What is happening? There is no variable "dst" in structure 
> ip_conntrack_tuple in 
> /usr/src/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_conntrack_tuple.h (i hope i 
> found the right place :-) ).
>
> Regards, Frank.
> --
> SYNTAGS GmbH, Märkische Str. 237, D-44141 Dortmund, Germany Security, 
> Cryptography, Networks, Software Development http://www.syntags.de 
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

Hi there Frank !

I am also running kernel 2.4.18 and have the exact same problem as you when I try to 
compile it with the pending-patches in iptables 1.2.6 or even patch-o-matic for that 
matter. I hope the netfilter team fix that soon and that they see our problems here =) 
Seems a bit serious if u can`t even compile the stuff. And I want that new local NAT 
-feature bad =)

Regards
/Micke



Reply via email to