Just for the record, due to the recent metadiscussion about spam, I'll stop reading the list for a while. It takes 10ms to 'D' the spam, but the metadiscussion does not match my usual neuronal spam filter, so it is really annoying.
Anybody expecting me writing on my usual pet peeves, remove that expectation, please :) have a nice april & may Patrick On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:06:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I think we should attack the open relays and disable their machines... Just my >mentality... They clutter us up and because of their ignorance, or their not caring >about it, causes us loss in cpu cycles and having to delete the messages, not to >mention the bandwidth costs. I think we should cause loss on their end to balance >it... I know the first time I was hacked and disabled for being stupid I learned >mighty quick not to let it happen again. > Most open relays (which are listed in the header of the email itself) are VERY >open.... (blank administrator PW or very easy to root with win2k resource kit tools) > I know this idea will not jibe with most, but what else can we do? The admins of >these domains don't care, and if we block them they barrage with emails "release the >block..." even if we report spam repeatedly...
