ons, 2002-04-24 kl. 11:23 skrev Maciej Soltysiak: > The only difference between simple *nix traceroute and tracert is that > tracert uses icmp echo requests instead of high UDP port packets. > And that it differentiates between icmp echo replies and ttl exceeded > instead of dest port unreach and ttl exceeded.
I try not to use Windows. Ever. But now and again I have to. It's like having to go to the loo. I read somewhere, that pre-XP didn't have the possibility of using raw sockets. Oh yes, it was the famous Mr. Gibson. And that ICMP raw socket echo requests wouldn't be possible - that the whole thing was fudged with UDP or TCP. So there must be a distinction between pre-XP and post-XP tracert. Or not? Tony -- Tony Earnshaw e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.billy.demon.nl gpg public key: http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor Telefoon: (+31) (0)172 530428 Mobiel: (+31) (0)6 51153356 GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981 3BE7B981
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel
