May I see the command you use to load the module, (and to satisfy my curisoty the output of 'uname -a')
// George On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:17:09AM +0530, Arindam Haldar wrote: >no this is not htb or imq specific problem !!... i have tried >with/without imq/htb/ vanila iptables... at this point of time thereis >no htb or imq ie not complied in kernel or with iptables... but i still >get the messages !....:( >friends do any of u faced this problem or is it the first time ? >Plsssssssssssssssssssssssssss i NEEEEEEEEEEED help !!!! > >Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: >> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Arindam Haldar wrote: >> >>>>yes..:)... sorry for being a little cryptic ;)... but u guessed it right >>>>!..so i will summarize my 2 Question in this listing--> >>>>1)i am getting these messages in my /var/log/messages.. >>>> >>>> iptables v1.2.7-20020423 with kernel 2.4.18 & patched htb3.3-020512 & >>>>imq-2.4.18... >>>>May 30 05:09:58 cab1 kernel: ASSERT: ip_nat_core.c:840 >>>>&ip_conntrack_lock not readlocked > >>>May 30 05:09:58 cab1 kernel: ASSERT: ip_conntrack_core.c:91 > >>>&ip_conntrack_lock_R71150de5 readlocked >>>can someone tell me whats wrong ?..how can i solve this problem?? > >> I'd suggest to start with a new 2.4.18 kernel, without the htb3 and imq >> patches applied. Check out that it works, without emitting such messages. >> >> If the problem persists, then it might be a netfilter related problem >> (there still can be bad hardvare...). If the problem disappears then >> it is related to the two additional extra patches. >> >> Regards, >> Jozsef > > > -- GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architect cell: 347-451-8229 Security Services, Web, Mail, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] File, Print, DB and DNS Servers. http://www.galis.org/george
