are there some real statistics on what is needed?

I'm setting up a t-1 and 1/3 of a t-1 on a p166 64meg (Bering floppy), I
know that's enough for masq, but I want to fit mrtg and ToS (throttling)
in there too, so I'm not sure. I could scp (or mail?) the logs and make
graphs on a faster pc... what do you all recommend? 

// George

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:45:49PM -0500, Matthew Hellman wrote:
>ipchains isn't iptables...and you were probably also running a much
>different (older) kernel...so we're talking apples and oranges here. I'm not
>saying it woudn't work mind you...it probably would.  I sure wouldn't
>recommend it to anyone though and I personally wouldn't think of going with
>anything less that a P60 and 64MB ram.  If that's all you've got lying
>around though...it's worth a shot.
>
>Matt
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sandy Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:11 AM
>Subject: Re: Lowest spec processor that netfilter will run on
>
>
>> Matthew Hellman wrote:
>> >
>> > I can't speak for non x86 processors, but I have mine running on a
>Pentium
>> > 60 mhz with 64MB ram....runs pretty well although I personally wouldn't
>> > consider going with anything less.
>>
>> I ran a firewall for a year or two using a 486/66
>> with 24 megs, using ipchains, on a 2.2 Mbps ADSL
>> link. The only problem was keeping log size under
>> control on a 170 meg drive.
>>
>> There are some numbers for related things at:
>> http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_snaps/NEW-SNAP/doc/performance.html
>>
>
>
>

-- 
GEORGE GEORGALIS, System Admin/Architect    cell: 347-451-8229 
Security Services, Web, Mail,            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
File, Print, DB and DNS Servers.       http://www.galis.org/george 


Reply via email to