Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
> [sorry for the nonexistent In-Reply-To/whatever headers - cutting&pasting]
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>> A common and very subtle bug is to use list_heads which aren't on any
>> lists. It causes kernel memory corruption which is observed long after
>> the offending code has executed.
>>
>> The patch nulls out the dangling pointers so we get a nice oops at the
>> site of the buggy code.
>
>
> I'm not current with the kernel tree, but will one such oops occur in
> netfilter? See
>
> http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/netfilter-announce/2002/000010.html
>
> Hmm, no. A DoS maybe?
>
An oops, actually. This code:
/* Remove from both hash lists: must not NULL out next ptrs,
otherwise we'll look unconfirmed. Fortunately, LIST_DELETE
doesn't do this. --RR */
LIST_DELETE(&ip_conntrack_hash
[hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple)],
&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL]);
LIST_DELETE(&ip_conntrack_hash
[hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple)],
&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY]);
I think what is needed is:
--- 2.5.20/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c~ipconntrack-lists Fri Jun 7
11:26:38 2002
+++ 2.5.20-akpm/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c Fri Jun 7 11:26:42 2002
@@ -210,17 +210,22 @@ static void destroy_expectations(struct
static void
clean_from_lists(struct ip_conntrack *ct)
{
+
struct list_head *l1;
+
struct list_head *l2;
+
DEBUGP("clean_from_lists(%p)\n", ct);
MUST_BE_WRITE_LOCKED(&ip_conntrack_lock);
-
/* Remove from both hash lists: must not NULL out next ptrs,
- otherwise we'll look unconfirmed. Fortunately, LIST_DELETE
- doesn't do this. --RR */
+
+
l1 = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL];
+
l2 = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY];
+
LIST_DELETE(&ip_conntrack_hash
[hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple)],
-
&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL]);
-
LIST_DELETE(&ip_conntrack_hash
-
[hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple)],
-
&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY]);
+
l1);
+
if (l1 != l2)
+
LIST_DELETE(&ip_conntrack_hash
+
[hash_conntrack(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple)],
+
l2);
/* Destroy all un-established, pending expectations */
destroy_expectations(ct);
-
