ons, 2002-06-26 kl. 17:28 skrev George Georgalis: ons, 2002-06-26 kl. 17:28 skrev George Georgalis:
> not true. that email contained text/plain and text/html versions of > the body. which is the prefered method to send mail if you want html > available, I think there is an RFC supporting this. > > 1 <no description> [multipa/alternativ, 7bit, 3.3K] > 2 <no description> [text/plain, 7bit, US-ASCII, 1.0K] > 3 <no description> [text/html, 7bit, US-ASCII, 2.0K] > > If you are marking messages of this type as spam (because they include > html), it may be a mistake. Tried to send this privately, but your mailserver is obviously on the blink: George, I make up my own rules, and those are my rules. *No html in my Evolution mailbox*. I've been having trouble with Spamassassin, and that's my own fault. Others should know that .htm[l], nor viri, are *not* welcome in my mailbox. Best, -- Tony Earnshaw e-post: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.billy.demon.nl gpg public key: http://www.billy.demon.nl/tonni.armor Telefoon: (+31) (0)172 530428 Mobiel: (+31) (0)6 51153356 GPG Fingerprint = 3924 6BF8 A755 DE1A 4AD6 FA2B F7D7 6051 3BE7 B981 3BE7B981
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel
