On Wednesday, July 30, 2014 4:56:22 PM UTC+2, Corey Brady wrote: > or an approach that gets around commandLater()'s need for strings and > somehow digs deeper into the receiving-netlogo's workspace for a way to > call the netlogo procedure directly and using a LogoList argument? (I'm not > familiar with this second path) >
It depends on what you are doing. For simple enough things you can get away with using strings. If you need it to work with any kind of NetLogo value, not just simple ones like e.g. lists of numbers, then you can't rely on round-tripping through strings and will need to switch to an approach like the one you describe. If you end up needing that approach, we can discuss details. I remember discussing it with A****** H****** in the context of his über top secret L********** project, and I think I might have even made some tweaks to the workspace code and/or Evaluator to make it easier. Those conversations and commits could be dug up. Seth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netlogo-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
