On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 6:59:01 PM UTC-4, Seth Tisue wrote: > > see also https://github.com/NetLogo/NetLogo/issues/539 >
I don't like the `apply` proposal as well as the `sequence` proposal, but it points to the same issue, even if it offers a less general solution. The existence of the issue is the reason for proposing a new primitive. Is there any sympathy for this? Alan Isaac -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netlogo-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
