This looks it will produce correct output in many cases, but I'm not convinced it's correct in general.
Does it work on a case like this, and on even more deeply nested cases? to-report foo [x] report x end to-report bar [x] report x end to baz __ignore foo bar 0 end I'm looking at your logic and it isn't clear to me that all possible nestings (including recursive nestings) of _call and _callreport are handled properly, hence the test case. I don't see anywhere in your code that recursively processes entire argument trees, and not just the first level of the tree. Also a nitpick that won't usually affect correctness: you shouldn't need to resort to looking for "_call" and "_callreport' as strings — _call and _callreport are classes, you should be able to detect instances of them via pattern matching (or `isInstanceOf`). Seth -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "netlogo-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to netlogo-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/netlogo-devel/9d8d89fe-66e8-494f-9786-154217a5b94fn%40googlegroups.com.
