Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >>I think the two leafs are coupled through the path statement and so the > >>values of both should conform to the same type. If I extend Balazs¹ > >>example with uint8 and 1..10 range: > >> > >>1. Would a leafref value of 256 be acceptable? > >> > >>2. How about "foo"? > > > > > > I agree it doesn't makes sense, but is the configuration invalid? > > > > The leafref is marked require-instance=false, it just means a matching > > condition will never succeed. > > > > If require-instance = false then the node must conform to > the data type for the leaf. This means the typedef used > in the implemented version.
+1 /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
