Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:05:07AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > > It is also important for the JSON encoding - it means there won’t > necessarily be a way for mapping XML-encoded instance to JSON and > vice versa. > > > > Because of two different namespace identifiers. So here we go.
There are other reasons as well, e.g., <foo>42</foo> might be encoded as: "foo": 42 or "foo": "42" or "foo": [42] or "foo": ["42"] depending on the data model. The JSON encoding process needs the data model. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
