Hi,
I have reviewed this document, and here are my comments. I have some
technical issues; apart from that I think this document is ready
for publication.
I have also implemented this statement in pyang (see the branch
'yang-metadata' in pyang's github).
Technical issues:
o The 'type' statement is optional in 'md:annotation', and if it is
not present, the type defaults to string. I think this is bad
design:
- it is not consistent with how 'type' is used in other
YANG statements (leaf, leaf-list, typedef).
- it is not as clear for the reader as having an explicit
type.
- it saves just a few characters in every annotation (and
annotations will be rare) so it is not worth it.
I suggest making 'type' mandatory in 'md:annotation'.
o The type of the argument to 'md:annotation' is not specified. It
should be an "identifier" (as defined in 6020bis).
o Last paragraph of section 3 and the "description" in the
extension.
The text says that semantics are defined "by other means". I
think the semantics should be defined in the
description/reference statements (by using links or inline text
doesn't matter).
Editorial issues:
o You may want to change the "inactive" example to something less
controversial. For example:
module example-comment {
namespace "http://example.org/example-comment";;
prefix "ein";
import ietf-yang-metadata {
prefix "md";
}
md:annotation comment {
type string;
description
"This annotation is used to attach a free-form comment to
any data node.";
}
}
o Update the copyright year to 2015.
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
