On 6/17/15, 8:46 AM, "Martin Bjorklund" <[email protected]> wrote: >Again, my point is really that what to do and what is a safe behavior >depends on the attribute. This document should not try to solve that >problem. >
This makes sense to me >(In our case, if the client doesn't ask for inactive nodes, we prune >them from the result). > But then doesn't round-tripping (replace) cause the inactive nodes to be lost? Thanks, Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
