Hi,
I am preparing a new version of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis in order
to address Y45-04. Note that YANG 1.1 uses the module
ietf-yang-library from draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library (hence the
crossposting).
[BTW, shouldn't ietf-yang-library be moved to NETMOD?]
We have a whole bunch of documents that have a normative reference to
draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis, which has a normative reference to
draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library. This means we need to finish this
document pretty soon.
I ran into some issues with ietf-yang-library:
1. The leaf "conformance" is of type "boolean". It is not obvious
what "conformance = false" means. Should we change the name
and/or type of this leaf?
I don't have a good proposal, but what we need is a way to
indicate "I implement the protocol accessible nodes in this
module" vs. "I just list this module b/c some other module that
I implement uses typdefs/groupings/... from it".
This issue is related to the github issue #3. I think we need
this information; Y45-04 relies on it.
2. The "/modules/module" list is keyed by "name" and "revision".
Should we really have "revision" as key? A server can only
implement one revision of a module, and should only list one
revision of a module w/ conformance = false. I suggest we make
this leaf mandatory, and not part of the key.
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
