Hi, is it OK that 6020bis again defines “YANG Module Names” registry? It was already defined in RFC 6020 so I’d say it shouldn’t be repeated.
Also, the two registered namespace URIs should IMO be
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:yin:1.1
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:1.1
Lada
--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
