fantastic!
> On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Anees Shaikh <[email protected]> wrote: > > We've posted a new version of our draft: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01 > > It includes a section on the issues that were raised and our > observation/comment. It also adds a detailed section on terminology based on > the interim calls, and updates the operational requirements with further > details. > > thanks. > -- Anees > > >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Nadeau Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > One of the actions from the last Interim meeting was to have both >> > sides of the issues around the open config approach to create at >> > least >> > slides/textual bullet points for use during our discussion in Praha >> > so >> > we can come to a conclusion around the final issues. We need these >> > slides/bullet points to be listed on the list here and continue the >> > discussion here BEFORE the Praha meeting. I’d like to ask Anees and >> > Rob to write up their side of the story. As I recall Juergen, Kent, >> > Martin and Andy were the most vocal around the other side of things, >> > so I would like to ask them to write up their side of things. Can >> > you >> > all please confirm your acceptance of this action and a target for >> > when you will post the issues? >> >> We have posted our thoughts in this draft: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-openconfig-reply-00 >> >> >> /martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
