Jernej Tuljak <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > since draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-04 describes a special mapping for > instance-identifiers, I'm wondering about how to handle values which are > constrained using the standard XML specific yang:xpath1.0 type or a > derivative of it. I assume the same or similar rules should apply to any > XPath expression that appears in a JSON instance, right? Perhaps this > deserves mention in the I-D?
>From the definition of the xpath1.0 type it seems clear that values of this type must be "real" XPath expressions as specified in [XPATH]. The necessary context info (including prefix bindings) has to be provided in the description of the data node that uses this type. So this is OK even if xpath1.0 values appear in JSON. Instance-identifiers need a different approach because their context is defined through "XML namespace scope" that is absent in JSON. Lada > > Jernej > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
