On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:16:46AM +0200, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > > On 20 Jul 2015, at 23:00, Juergen Schoenwaelder > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Lada, > > > > Y34 is closed and I have not seen any new argument here that indicates > > we made a major mistake with the resolution of Y34. As such, Y34 > > remains closed. > > Of course, I was expecting this reaction. I think I did present *some* > arguments, and I am leaving it to others to judge whether they are relevant > or not. Even if it was a minor mistake, it is IMO still worth fixing. > > > > > If you want to discuss new ideas to relocate or "symlink" data models, > > please do so in a separate thread. (And no, we do not accept new > > issues for YANG 1.1 either at this point in time.) > > It’s not about symlinks in the data tree but rather about a method for > combining schemas that is complementary to “augment” - pull versus push. > > There is sufficient evidence that it was one of the use cases for “anydata”, > e.g. in configlets. The gap in “anydata” definition for similar use cases is > that it cannot specify a schema for its contents. >
Lada, you can't simply 'mount' a data model into a different place. Think about paths in must or when expressions, or think about paths contraints in leafrefs etc. And Y34 was not trying to solve this problem, so this discussion is IMHO under a misleading subject line. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
