On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:46:49PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > Andy, > > On 07/27/2015 12:58 PM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't think a standard for relocating subtrees would be worth it. > > I am not in favor of moving /interfaces or /system to a new location. > > That's not how YANG works. It only allows "obsolete and start over". > > > > I would suggest pursuing solutions that don't cause > > as much disruption and expense as possible. > > > > I think it would be really good to explore other, less "disruptive" > options. >
I think the first step is to find out whether there is a problem worth to be fixed. Why are the RFCs in question broken? (Yes, I have read the openconfig IDs, I listened to the virtual interim meetings, I assume you have read draft-bjorklund-netmod-openconfig-reply.) Lets get the core of the openconfig argument on the table why the existing RFCs are flawed. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
