> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 13 Aug 2015, at 21:31, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > IMO this is issue is closed. > > > I see no reason to re-open it. > > > YANG does not allow augments to add mandatory nodes. > > > > I strongly disagree with this attitude, this is a normal IETF procedure. > > Things can be changed even during WGLC. > > > > Virtual interims aren?t good for discussing non-trivial technical issues. > > > > > I am not hearing any new arguments for changing this rule for augments. > It's up to the co-chairs whether they want to re-open this issue.
This might be ignorance of detail, but doesn't this approach essentially force vendors to publish [what i've been calling] enterprise yang models for models that they might otherwise just augment to support proprietary features? if so, what is the point of defining *any* models? > > > > Lada > > > > > Andy _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
