> On 24 Aug 2015, at 21:01, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On 24 Aug 2015, at 20:17, Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> YANG does not provide any mechanism to REQUIRE modules A and B >>> to both be implemented on a server. You may think it should, but >>> currently the YANG conformance is for an individual module. >> >> There are sections on conformance and conformance announcement, and >> they say nothing like this. > > No Andy is correct, except that if module A augments module B, then a > server that implements A MUST also implement B.
Of course, there is no way how to learn about all modules in the known universe that augment B, but I’ve been always talking about the situation where the server advertises *both* A and B. I hope we all agree that the server then does implement A and B, and both modules are part of the data model. > > But I don't understand what this has to do with the issue. Right, so what’s your answer to my question? Is the datastore where “foo” is missing valid or not? Lada > > > /martin -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
