On 1 Sep 2015, at 18:30, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:58:59PM +0100, Giles Heron wrote: >> On 1 Sep 2015, at 17:47, Juergen Schoenwaelder >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I suggest people write I-Ds if they have any far reaching ideas. >> >> I think GitHub would be better. The overhead is much lower than writing a >> draft. >> > > IETF processes usually starts with ideas presented in I-Ds. I do not > care much which tools people use to produce I-Ds.
sure, that is the process in general. But I’m unconvinced that it’s the right way to proceed with YANG. E.g. we used a numbered of issues for YANG 1.1. So why not a numbered list of suggestions for YANG 2.0? Giles > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
